Tag Archives: annual meeting

The Significance of Pro Bono Service

Pro bono is an important part of every lawyer’s career, so when a judicial candidate’s pro bono work came into question at a recent Governor’s Council hearing, we took issue.  An attorney’s commitment to pro bono should be applauded and not criticized.  Some would say attorneys have a professional obligation to do pro bono work because upholding fairness, credibility and impartiality of our justice system is the right thing to do, especially for those who cannot otherwise afford an attorney. 

Lawyers have a unique skill set and knowledge of our justice system that can be used to provide access to justice for those who might not otherwise have it in both the civil and criminal arenas.  This sometimes means representing unpopular clients or causes, regardless of the allegations.  It can also mean filing an amicus brief involving vital legal principles, without regard to the political climate.

As the great Justice Felix Frankfurter once said, “it is a fair summary of history to say that the safeguards of liberty have been forged in controversies involving not very nice people.” Lawyers, often providing their skills on a pro bono basis, ensure the integrity of the adversarial process.  The BBA’s first president, John Adams, gained a certain degree of notoriety and, eventually, the utmost respect, for his work defending British soldiers charged with the murder of patriots at the Boston Massacre. 

The BBA is proud to bestow awards on lawyers performing pro bono service, and is especially cognizant of the fact that advocating on behalf of the criminally accused or people on the margins of society requiring assistance with homelessness, mental illness, and Social Security may be misunderstood in quarters outside bar associations, making these attorneys the targets of criticism.  Unfortunately, some people confuse the preservation of individual rights with advocacy for a political cause, but the bottom line is that acccess to justice for all is one of the pillars of our justice system and of our democracy.  Lawyers should not be confused with their clients, and pro bono work should not be a mark of shame for any lawyer, and should never disqualify a nominee from judicial service.

– Jonathan Schreiber
Legislative and Public Policy Manager
Boston Bar Association
Comments are disabled for this blog. To submit your comments please e-mail  issuespot@bostonbar.org

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

New Year at the BBA Means Renewed Focus on Important Issues

It’s September and that means the BBA’s program year has begun, and we are already off to a busy start. We welcomed our new president, J.D. Smeallie, and we have a full slate of things on the horizon.

Annual Meeting Luncheon
This year’s Annual Meeting is scheduled for September 21st at the Boston Sheraton Hotel. The event begins at 11:30 a.m. and features keynote speaker Senator Patrick Leahy . This former Vermont state prosecutor shares a common passion with the BBA – ensuring access to justice for all. He has championed several critical pieces of federal criminal justice reform legislation. The Senator’s work on these issues – particularly on the Justice for All Act of 2004 – has been essential to making our criminal justice system accessible to everyone.

The Justice for All Act of 2004 is a comprehensive package of criminal justice reforms. Senator Leahy was instrumental in drafting the legislation in 2004 and getting it passed. He is so committed to this issue that he introduced legislation to reauthorize the criminal justice package last year. Under his leadership as Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, the reauthorization legislation passed the Senate in June 2012.

One of Senator Leahy’s key contributions to the Justice for All Act of 2004 and the reauthorization legislation is the Innocence Protection Act. The Innocence Protection Act includes procedures for post-conviction DNA testing in federal court (sound familiar?). It also establishes the Bloodsworth Grant Program, which provides money to states to help offset the costs of post-conviction DNA testing. Now that Massachusetts passed the BBA’s legislation providing access to post-conviction DNA testing, we join the 48 other states that are eligible to apply for Bloodsworth funds. Senator Leahy’s work on these issues has gone a long way to ensure a more reliable system of forensic science and criminal justice.

Child Support Guidelines
On September 27th, the BBA is hosting the Trial Court’s Child Support Guidelines Task Force. Since federal law requires that the Guidelines be reviewed every four years, the Task Force has opened a comment period and will hold hearings around the state. The Trial Court’s Task Force is being led by Chief Justice Paula Carey of the Probate and Family Court. The BBA’s Family Law Section reviewed the Guidelines and will submit its comments to the Trial Court’s Task Force for its consideration.

The Guidelines are of tremendous importance to not only the legal community, but also to the public. Parents receiving child support, lawyers, judges, and others are concerned about the fair application of these Guidelines. Since non-custodial and custodial parents cannot always agree on what is enough support for their children, the Guidelines help ensure that children are adequately supported by their parents. The judges of the Trial Court use the Guidelines in setting orders for current child support, in deciding whether to approve agreements for child support, and when addressing the modification of existing orders.

Meeting with the Courts
This month the new BBA president will start meeting with each of the Chief Justices of the Massachusetts state and federal courts. These meetings help the BBA understand the issues faced by members of the judiciary and frame our advocacy efforts for the year ahead. In recent years, court funding has been the major focus for our state courts as the Judiciary struggles meeting the demand for justice amid inadequate resources.

Changes to Court Rules
The Supreme Judicial Court expects to release changes to both the Model Jury Instructions and Rules 12 and 29 of the Massachusetts Rules of Criminal Procedure – check out last month’s Issue Spot post for more information. Both SJC committees reviewing these rules are expected to meet this month.

Further on the horizon, arguments in the Fisher v. University of Texas Supreme Court case are scheduled for October 10th.  It promises to be a busy, but very challenging fall.  Check back with Issue Spot to keep up to date with it all.

-Kathleen Joyce
Government Relations Director
Boston Bar Association
Comments are disabled for this blog.  To share your comments e-mail issuespot@bostonbar.org

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized