Before we break to celebrate Thanksgiving, let’s pause to remember what we’re thankful for. . .
- The fact that the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights provides for three co-equal branches of government: Executive, Legislative, and the Judiciary.
- The work of our Amicus Committee in Bird and Fisher. Our Bird brief brought clarity and predictability to the estate planning process, and our Fisher brief articulated our long held commitment to diversity and inclusion in the legal profession.
- The passage of the Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act, a great example of true grassroots activism, coalition building and collaboration. Democracy is not always efficient, but the process was exemplary, allowing stakeholders to speak and be heard.
- The passage of the Transgender Equality Rights bill. This bill was 5 years in the making, and it was high time that Massachusetts provided important protections to the transgender community.
- The CORI Sealing Order was made permanent by the Boston Municipal Court. This will allow multiple motions from different districts to be heard in one of the courts with jurisdiction over a case to be sealed. More important it facilitates re-entry.
Government Relations Director
Boston Bar Association
Comments are disabled for this blog. To share your comments e-mail firstname.lastname@example.org
Tuesday’s SJC decision in Rachel A. Bird Anderson vs. BNY Mellon, N.A. trustee and others, helped reinforce our belief that there’s no one tool for achieving public policy goals. When we failed to secure the passage of legislation that would repeal an overly broad 2009 amendment to the adopted children statute yielding unintended consequences, we turned our energies to an amicus brief. Our brief identified the confusion resulting from the 2009 amendment; in its decision in Bird, the SJC provided essential clarification.
It’s rewarding to read the SJC’s decision on many levels. It settles a family dispute, provides trustees with much needed assurances and also means that the BBA won’t need to re-file legislation we’ve supported since 2009. The BBA’s bill, An Act to Repeal the Adopted Children Statute, was drafted as a statutory fix to the problem that the Bird decision just solved.
When this issue was first brought to our attention, the BBA worked quickly to file legislation that would repeal language that had broad and far reaching implications on trust instruments dealing with adopted children. As we described in Issue Spot, the BBA succeeded in obtaining a one year postponement of the original effective date of this new law and has been working since then to repeal it.
This past legislative session, the BBA’s repeal of the adopted children statute became part of a number of pieces of legislation to address various trusts and estate problems. These bills included a proposed Massachusetts Uniform Trust Code (MUTC), technical corrections to the Massachusetts Uniform Probate Code (MUPC), and an estate tax patch. Now that the SJC has weighed in on the adopted children statute, we can claim victory for all but a small portion of our trusts and estates agenda. Earlier this summer Issue Spot reported on the passage of the MUTC and technical corrections to the MUPC.
Our success is particularly gratifying because it can be difficult to catch the attention of the Legislature on trusts and estates matters. They aren’t splashy or as headline grabbing as, say, casinos or health care reform. Our dedicated and highly knowledgeable members deserve the credit for volunteering their time to testify, meet with legislators and draft impeccable amicus briefs. We will next focus our trusts and estates energies on the estate tax patch and any other emerging issues in this area.
– Kathleen Joyce
Director of Government Relations
Boston Bar Association
Comments are disabled for this blog. To submit your comments please e-mail email@example.com